Everyone was concerned about age catching up with the well loved bachelor in the group. Wherever they went they attempted to identify the woman of his life by scanning the horizon. But this effort can be compared to searching for a needle in a haystack. It is said that marriages or partnerships or whatever its called today are made in heaven. I think not! The ones in heaven are not in control either. The heavenly creatures taking care of these connections and interconnections are probably shrugging their shoulders and uttering frustrated "Why us!" as I write these lines.
As ever, the discussion around the table was about this bachelor's marriage. The one's who had experienced marriage were presenting arguments on the futility of this institution; the younger ones with a shade of romance and the older one with stoic resignation. The bachelor from time to time tried to say something but his words were smothered down by the talkers. The other bachelors and spinsters looked from face to face in silence with expressions bordering on "what the hell are these old hags talking". But they did not dare to open their mouth for they were worried that the smothering might go beyond their words.
The conversation went here, there and then elsewhere before settling, an hour and half later, to a comfortable nowhere. At the end of the day, it was like an episode of the sitcom Friends. Every time an ardent fan talked about an episode, the casual fan would only have a vague memory of having seen or heard it. The ardent fan would continue with a "don't you remember? It was in episode 5 of season 11 in the 5th year prior to the turn of the century." The casual fan to end the discussion would agree "Oh yes! I remember, the one with Joey and Ross drinking coffee right?" Many days later, while watching a rerun they would come across the episode and realize "so this is what that fellow was talking about is it? Oh! Now I get it." Most, if not all, spinsters and bachelors have to live through marriage to understand the words of the expounders.
I like using the word institution for marriage. The definition of institution is "an organization founded for a religious, educational, professional, or social purpose." Its true, isn't it? Let us have a look at all those forbidding words in that definition.
1. Organization: mean an organized group of people with a particular purpose. The purpose seems to be clear, at least to everyone other than the ones getting married. Even the ones who are not yet married have played their parts in this organization by growing up in it.
2. Religious: Survey's around the globe have found that 84% to 87% of marriages have religion associated with it in one form or other and at one time or other.
3. Education: Marriage is all about education. First the spouses get educated about each other and their families (actually, this could go on for a lifetime). Once children make an entry, all education is centered around them.
4. Profession: means a paid occupation, especially one that involves prolonged training and a formal qualification. Doesn't that definition sound terrible? I have known and been in professions that did not pay anything. What the hell does "involves prolonged training and a formal qualification" mean? This definition does not fit the current age. But profession is an occupation, which means a way of spending time. There is a lot of occupation in marriage with prolonged learning.
5. Social: Social means relating to society. Isn't marriage all about society? The questions raised by the society formed a part of the one and a half hour discussion. These questions result in marriages and many results in a marriage. "Why is she/he not getting married?" "Is he/she OK? I mean he/she is alright na?" "When are they getting married? They are all around the place." "I saw them walking on mount road holding hands. You have to do something about it." "Only registering the marriage! No reception?" "Any good news?" "Congratulations!" "Any good news?" "Only one! Wouldn't he/she be lonely when he/she grows up. Poor child will have no one to fight over all this property." Marriages drive society and society drives marriages - things cannot be more social than this.
Thus, it seems marriages fit all the tenets of an institution. It is an institution preferred over the IITs and IIMs...
What's that! Wait a minute! Silence! I hear a feeble voice say something. What did you say? I can't hear you properly. Talk louder. Ah! Love! You ask "what about love?" Haven't you heard Tina Turner sing "what's love got to do with it"? Unfortunately, many bind love too close to marriage. They act as though love cannot exist with marriage and vice versa. Love is probably the most misunderstood word on the planet. It is defined as a strong feeling of affection. But thanks to people like Shakespeare and Dhanush it seems nothing like affection these days.
Many years ago, I had my first Eureka moment when I believed I had deciphered the essence of the word love. It did not take place in a bathtub but happened in a "necessity is the mother of invention" type situation.
A colleague of mine brought his classmate into many conversations. This girl had the same name as a well known heroine of those days. So I listened to these conversations with some interest. Once I had an opportunity to meet her at a concert too. As time passed I moved out of the project and city. One day, I was surprised to receive a mail from him. In the mail, he announced his impending marriage to his friend. He wrote that at some point of time, they realised they wanted to spend their lives with each other. I felt happy for him and responded with a "I am not surprised".
I got a shocked response from my colleague. He was a good-natured fellow and hence did not abuse me. He stressed that they were only friends and did not intend to fall in love with each other. Love landed on them like a bolt from the blue and took them by surprise. It seemed to him that I was hinting that something was going on all along and they had hidden it from the world. He tried his best to convince me that my supposition was incorrect. I did not think there was a problem in their hiding it, if they had wanted to do so. But my hinting it, though I maintain I had not, seemed wrong. Right or wrong, I had to get out of this situation. That night, I put on KennyG's Breathless, switched off the light and lay down on the bed thinking.
It was dark when I woke up. I looked at the clock and it said 1 AM. KennyG's breath was neither less nor more. I took out a paper and pen and started writing (these were the pre-laptop on every lap days and we had to use paper and pen). What I wrote that night went as a mail to my shocked colleague the next day.
I don't think you understand what I said. I did not mean you have hidden something from us. I only mean that you were in love all along. Love is love; it does not change from person to person. The love you feel for her today is the same as you for her felt yesterday and the day before. It is same as the love you feel for you father, mother, sibling or a friend like me. What changes is the way you express it and your commitment to the person. When the two of you decided to get married, the love did not change, only its expression changed. So I am never surprised when friends decide to take a step ahead. That is reason for my not being surprised.
I sent the mail and eagerly awaited the reply. It came in a matter of hours. He was very happy with what I had written. He agreed to every word I said and we continued to be friends. At least, I think we did as that was the last time we communicated with each other.
So this institution, like others round the world, does not require love. It is all about rules and responsibilities. As in the case of other institutions, people are dying to jump into it all the time. But soon after jumping in, they are dying to jump out. Actually that statement's not true - they are dying to jump into a similar institution ad infinitum.
It was dark when I woke up. I looked at the clock and it said 1 AM. KennyG's breath was neither less nor more. I took out a paper and pen and started writing (these were the pre-laptop on every lap days and we had to use paper and pen). What I wrote that night went as a mail to my shocked colleague the next day.
I don't think you understand what I said. I did not mean you have hidden something from us. I only mean that you were in love all along. Love is love; it does not change from person to person. The love you feel for her today is the same as you for her felt yesterday and the day before. It is same as the love you feel for you father, mother, sibling or a friend like me. What changes is the way you express it and your commitment to the person. When the two of you decided to get married, the love did not change, only its expression changed. So I am never surprised when friends decide to take a step ahead. That is reason for my not being surprised.
I sent the mail and eagerly awaited the reply. It came in a matter of hours. He was very happy with what I had written. He agreed to every word I said and we continued to be friends. At least, I think we did as that was the last time we communicated with each other.
So this institution, like others round the world, does not require love. It is all about rules and responsibilities. As in the case of other institutions, people are dying to jump into it all the time. But soon after jumping in, they are dying to jump out. Actually that statement's not true - they are dying to jump into a similar institution ad infinitum.